<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Things that shouldn&#8217;t bother me but do because I&#8217;m ridiculously obsessive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.serialdeviant.org/weblog/2008/06/13/things-that-shouldnt-bother-me-but-do-because-im-ridiculously-obsessive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.serialdeviant.org/weblog/2008/06/13/things-that-shouldnt-bother-me-but-do-because-im-ridiculously-obsessive/</link>
	<description>candour is good</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:51:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Loki</title>
		<link>http://www.serialdeviant.org/weblog/2008/06/13/things-that-shouldnt-bother-me-but-do-because-im-ridiculously-obsessive/comment-page-1/#comment-191810</link>
		<dc:creator>Loki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 02:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.serialdeviant.org/weblog/?p=2143#comment-191810</guid>
		<description>&quot;Those who are unable to distinguish between: . . .  c) its/it’s should have their Internet privileges taken away.&quot;

Indeed, the &quot;its/it&#039;s&quot; confusion gets worse than that.  More times than I care to think of, I&#039;ve seen the possessive &quot;its&quot; rendered as &quot;its&#039;&quot;.  Yes; with the poor apostrophe hanging useless and forlorn from the word&#039;s caboose.

We could all avoid the  &quot;x AM/PM in the morning/evening&quot; tautology if we used the sensible European 24-hour clock.  Having learned it perforce when the Army claimed me, I eventually realized its superiority.  The aviation community standardized on it long ago; you don&#039;t want any ambiguity when you communicate with Air Traffic Control.

Finally, I recall someone&#039;s report of a luncheon meeting being addressed by VP Dick Cheney, whose wife also attended.  He began by saying &quot;Thank you all for your kindness to my wife and me.&quot;  Whereupon one woman, at the table of the person reporting this, sneered &quot;That idiot!  He doesn&#039;t even know enough to say, &quot;My wife and I.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Those who are unable to distinguish between: . . .  c) its/it’s should have their Internet privileges taken away.&#8221;</p>
<p>Indeed, the &#8220;its/it&#8217;s&#8221; confusion gets worse than that.  More times than I care to think of, I&#8217;ve seen the possessive &#8220;its&#8221; rendered as &#8220;its&#8217;&#8221;.  Yes; with the poor apostrophe hanging useless and forlorn from the word&#8217;s caboose.</p>
<p>We could all avoid the  &#8220;x AM/PM in the morning/evening&#8221; tautology if we used the sensible European 24-hour clock.  Having learned it perforce when the Army claimed me, I eventually realized its superiority.  The aviation community standardized on it long ago; you don&#8217;t want any ambiguity when you communicate with Air Traffic Control.</p>
<p>Finally, I recall someone&#8217;s report of a luncheon meeting being addressed by VP Dick Cheney, whose wife also attended.  He began by saying &#8220;Thank you all for your kindness to my wife and me.&#8221;  Whereupon one woman, at the table of the person reporting this, sneered &#8220;That idiot!  He doesn&#8217;t even know enough to say, &#8220;My wife and I.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://www.serialdeviant.org/weblog/2008/06/13/things-that-shouldnt-bother-me-but-do-because-im-ridiculously-obsessive/comment-page-1/#comment-191613</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 09:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.serialdeviant.org/weblog/?p=2143#comment-191613</guid>
		<description>Oo-er. Hehe, I tend to write stuff not as an English freak but just a freak!

Um, I did not realise Glenn would be linking to this and exposing my non-English teacher-ness to the wider world.

Haha!

I am really guilty of saying &#039;okay&#039; way more than necessary, and loads of other language infractions. I actually think it&#039;s a massively irritating character quirk more than trying to be clever... but that only applies to me, of course. Everyone else is just not speaking English correctly. Haha again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oo-er. Hehe, I tend to write stuff not as an English freak but just a freak!</p>
<p>Um, I did not realise Glenn would be linking to this and exposing my non-English teacher-ness to the wider world.</p>
<p>Haha!</p>
<p>I am really guilty of saying &#8216;okay&#8217; way more than necessary, and loads of other language infractions. I actually think it&#8217;s a massively irritating character quirk more than trying to be clever&#8230; but that only applies to me, of course. Everyone else is just not speaking English correctly. Haha again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cogito Ergo Doleo</title>
		<link>http://www.serialdeviant.org/weblog/2008/06/13/things-that-shouldnt-bother-me-but-do-because-im-ridiculously-obsessive/comment-page-1/#comment-191554</link>
		<dc:creator>Cogito Ergo Doleo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 04:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.serialdeviant.org/weblog/?p=2143#comment-191554</guid>
		<description>Excellents points made and earned in this post.  Thanks to Frank Wilson for his link to it.  Many of the above-cited, natch, bug this commentarian&#039;s bum; but, one worth noting, IMO?  The way in which an apostrophe dis/graces items such as the 1960&#039;s (when it ought to read &quot;the 1960s&quot;).  Another niggle?  The way in which otherwise brilliant writers put the period outside the closing parens in those instances where it belongs before it.  (Then, of course, there are the Safirical no-nos.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellents points made and earned in this post.  Thanks to Frank Wilson for his link to it.  Many of the above-cited, natch, bug this commentarian&#8217;s bum; but, one worth noting, IMO?  The way in which an apostrophe dis/graces items such as the 1960&#8217;s (when it ought to read &#8220;the 1960s&#8221;).  Another niggle?  The way in which otherwise brilliant writers put the period outside the closing parens in those instances where it belongs before it.  (Then, of course, there are the Safirical no-nos.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.serialdeviant.org/weblog/2008/06/13/things-that-shouldnt-bother-me-but-do-because-im-ridiculously-obsessive/comment-page-1/#comment-191530</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 01:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.serialdeviant.org/weblog/?p=2143#comment-191530</guid>
		<description>People who can&#039;t spell lose.  I see loose more times than I can imagine.  Drives me nuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who can&#8217;t spell lose.  I see loose more times than I can imagine.  Drives me nuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Mercury</title>
		<link>http://www.serialdeviant.org/weblog/2008/06/13/things-that-shouldnt-bother-me-but-do-because-im-ridiculously-obsessive/comment-page-1/#comment-191238</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mercury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 11:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.serialdeviant.org/weblog/?p=2143#comment-191238</guid>
		<description>&quot;Things that shouldn’t bother me but do because I’m ridiculously obsessive&quot;

The &quot;ridiculously&quot; is redundant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Things that shouldn’t bother me but do because I’m ridiculously obsessive&#8221;</p>
<p>The &#8220;ridiculously&#8221; is redundant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert argyle</title>
		<link>http://www.serialdeviant.org/weblog/2008/06/13/things-that-shouldnt-bother-me-but-do-because-im-ridiculously-obsessive/comment-page-1/#comment-191199</link>
		<dc:creator>robert argyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 04:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.serialdeviant.org/weblog/?p=2143#comment-191199</guid>
		<description>People in the corrugated green region where I live are forever &quot;honing in on&quot; ideas for sermons, open slots in their schedules, names for their offspring, things of every conceivable nature. Damned if they ever home in on any of those things.

Things of every conceivable nature also &quot;impact&quot; them all the time. Which explains why colorectal surgeons hereabouts are so damn happy. All the time.

They commit these egregious and annoying usage errors irregardless of the fact that almost every one of them is someone whom has attended at least some public schools. 

Shocking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People in the corrugated green region where I live are forever &#8220;honing in on&#8221; ideas for sermons, open slots in their schedules, names for their offspring, things of every conceivable nature. Damned if they ever home in on any of those things.</p>
<p>Things of every conceivable nature also &#8220;impact&#8221; them all the time. Which explains why colorectal surgeons hereabouts are so damn happy. All the time.</p>
<p>They commit these egregious and annoying usage errors irregardless of the fact that almost every one of them is someone whom has attended at least some public schools. </p>
<p>Shocking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob weir</title>
		<link>http://www.serialdeviant.org/weblog/2008/06/13/things-that-shouldnt-bother-me-but-do-because-im-ridiculously-obsessive/comment-page-1/#comment-191192</link>
		<dc:creator>bob weir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 04:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.serialdeviant.org/weblog/?p=2143#comment-191192</guid>
		<description>I once posted on Motley Fool a series of grammatical</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once posted on Motley Fool a series of grammatical</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob weir</title>
		<link>http://www.serialdeviant.org/weblog/2008/06/13/things-that-shouldnt-bother-me-but-do-because-im-ridiculously-obsessive/comment-page-1/#comment-191191</link>
		<dc:creator>bob weir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 04:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.serialdeviant.org/weblog/?p=2143#comment-191191</guid>
		<description>I once posted on Motley Fool a series of grammatical 
 corrections.  My post was removed in one day.  
 Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once posted on Motley Fool a series of grammatical<br />
 corrections.  My post was removed in one day.<br />
 Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahman</title>
		<link>http://www.serialdeviant.org/weblog/2008/06/13/things-that-shouldnt-bother-me-but-do-because-im-ridiculously-obsessive/comment-page-1/#comment-191189</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 03:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.serialdeviant.org/weblog/?p=2143#comment-191189</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll tell you what ticks me off to no end: the substitution of &quot;your&quot; for &quot;you&#039;re&quot;.  Seriously, I&#039;ve had issues with this for a long time, and then I see it pop up everywhere on the web.  One is a possessive noun, one is a contraction for &quot;you are&quot;.  If nothing else comes of the lessons in these comments, please do this.  It&#039;s screwing up my reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll tell you what ticks me off to no end: the substitution of &#8220;your&#8221; for &#8220;you&#8217;re&#8221;.  Seriously, I&#8217;ve had issues with this for a long time, and then I see it pop up everywhere on the web.  One is a possessive noun, one is a contraction for &#8220;you are&#8221;.  If nothing else comes of the lessons in these comments, please do this.  It&#8217;s screwing up my reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave sf</title>
		<link>http://www.serialdeviant.org/weblog/2008/06/13/things-that-shouldnt-bother-me-but-do-because-im-ridiculously-obsessive/comment-page-1/#comment-191188</link>
		<dc:creator>dave sf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 03:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.serialdeviant.org/weblog/?p=2143#comment-191188</guid>
		<description>First, as regards 12 am or 12 pm. There is no such thing as these two times. There is 12 noon and there is 12 midnight.

Also, how about the oft-asked question, &quot;Where are you at?&quot; What&#039;s with the &quot;at&quot; in this statement? What does it add that, &quot;Where are you?&quot; doesn&#039;t say completely?

And here&#039;s one for us engineers: those dolts in baseball games that describe a pitch&#039;s velocity. It&#039;s &quot;speed,&quot; damn it! Speed is how fast an object moves (a scalar quantity). Velocity describes its speed and its direction (a vector quantity). Who ever heard of a police velocity trap testing drivers&#039; obeyance to the posted velocity limits? So, when that ninny Joe Morgan says &quot;velocity and placement&quot; it&#039;s even worse, because now he&#039;s being not just ignorant, but redundant. More syllables rarely make you sound more intelligent when a more appropriate word of fewer syllables will do just fine, thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, as regards 12 am or 12 pm. There is no such thing as these two times. There is 12 noon and there is 12 midnight.</p>
<p>Also, how about the oft-asked question, &#8220;Where are you at?&#8221; What&#8217;s with the &#8220;at&#8221; in this statement? What does it add that, &#8220;Where are you?&#8221; doesn&#8217;t say completely?</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s one for us engineers: those dolts in baseball games that describe a pitch&#8217;s velocity. It&#8217;s &#8220;speed,&#8221; damn it! Speed is how fast an object moves (a scalar quantity). Velocity describes its speed and its direction (a vector quantity). Who ever heard of a police velocity trap testing drivers&#8217; obeyance to the posted velocity limits? So, when that ninny Joe Morgan says &#8220;velocity and placement&#8221; it&#8217;s even worse, because now he&#8217;s being not just ignorant, but redundant. More syllables rarely make you sound more intelligent when a more appropriate word of fewer syllables will do just fine, thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
